Monday, April 24, 2017

Digital Media Performance Final: Artist/Teacher Statement

            As an artist, I was surprised at how challenging this project became for me. From the beginning of the project, I cared about our topic and felt that I had a lot to say. However, the vision I had for my contribution and the end product varied dramatically. I had originally planned to interview my sister in law and her wife, the mothers of one son and two daughters. I wanted to feature parents who don’t conform to traditional roles themselves, as both must double as care provider and money earner, to see if and how they enforce gender stereotypes on their children. However, due to schedules and camera rentals, they were unavailable. Instead, I talked to my sister and her three children. She didn’t say what I had expected her to (which was good, because that means she’s not conforming to gender stereotypes), and my plans for my segment of the performance had to change. Here was the difficulty: my plan didn’t work. Normally, I would have no trouble shaking off a failed idea and trying again. However, my anxiety in social situations has been increasing more and more, and failing in a group was a terrible experience. During rehearsals, segments of the performance which occurred before mine were given priority practice time, rather than dividing the time evenly between each idea. When we performed our preview, it was the first time we had run through my portion in its entirety.

            And it didn’t work.

            That feels obvious: how can something run smoothly with no rehearsal in a performative setting? The commentary we received confirmed something I already knew: it hadn’t worked at all. My group members made comments about rehearsing that portion more, and I only began to worry. My segment had failed, and no one wanted to bluntly tell me as much. Determined not to fail, I brainstormed and reconsidered until I had created a new idea. I didn’t change the video footage, but I did rework almost all of our interaction with it. Upon presenting it to the group, I was met with confusion and doubt. I explained again and again what I planned to do, how it would work, the upside of the change, the things that we would have to sacrifice that were good about the original performance, etc. It took thirty minutes before the group understood and accepted what I wanted to do, and for that entire thirty minutes, I fought the urge to say, “You’re right, it’s a stupid idea” and leave the room, probably crying. I know—really mature. Fortunately, I didn’t do that, and it all turned out just fine. But I learned that the vulnerability required to create art with a group is something that is more difficult for me to access and deal with than it has been in the past.


            That insight, more than anything, helped me understand how this kind of project would work in my classroom. Group work is always difficult, and devised theatre is such a vulnerable undertaking—if it was harrowing for me as an adult to accept that my artistic vision had failed and I need to try again, I can only imagine how much worse it would have been for me at the age of my future students. I would love to use devised theatre, but I think I would have to use it in a lower stakes environment, especially during my students’ first exposure to devising. Eventually, I’d love to be performing devised pieces with my advanced drama students. But in a class like ours, wherein some students have little to no theatre experience, I would devise as a classroom activity before using devising as an assessment. I thought this was a powerful assessment tool and there was adequate time and instruction given, but in implementing a similar experience in my classroom, I would have to a) teach the class about devising and allow them to experiment with it during class time, as an activity for which they are only graded on participation and b) use groups which have been constant over the semester. I think I would have done better with this project if I had been really, really close to the people I was working with. It’s a lot easier to accept rejection of an idea from friends than from classmates. Had this group been the same as my lesson plan group, or even if we had been in constant groups for the pedagogical deep dives, the trust and support would have already been established. This project, as well as many others I hope to assimilate into my own classroom (mostly stolen from TMA 301), requires a very strong safe space. Were I to use devising as an assessment, I would have to build and reinforce that safe space constantly in my classroom.